Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy.

Click Here for our professional translations.


Print Page Change Text Size: T T T


Essentials of Citizenship for a Complex, Interdependent World:

Critical Thinking and Ethical Values

 

By Paula Fraser

 

Dear Teacher,

I am a survivor of a concentration camp. My eyes saw what no person should witness: Gas chambers built by LEARNED engineers. Children poisoned by EDUCATED physicians. Infants killed by TRAINED nurses.  Women and babies shot and burned by HIGH SCHOOL and COLLEGE graduates.  My request is: Help your students become human. Your efforts must never produce learned monsters.  Reading, writing, and arithmetic are important only if they serve to make our children more human.                 

A quote from Haim Ginott’s Between Teacher and Child: A Book for Parent and Teachers. McMillan. 1972

 

The Christian Right folks of the Mike Huckabee variety often look at our society in the aftermath of tragedies such as the Sandy Hook shooting, or the many challenges that young people face such as drug abuse, unwed Motherhood, high school dropout rates… and see an absence of values—Christian values.  Their solution to addressing these challenges is simply to place school-sponsored prayer back in classrooms, or to hang the Ten Commandments in public school hallways, or to encourage young people to take Jesus as their Lord and Savior.  If only we implemented these Christian values we would have a more ethical society, they believe and argue.

 

Of course, we Humanists do understand that there are far too many complicated societal issues and problems facing young people today that these Religious Right folks have recognized as highlighted above. In fact, one facet of these multi-faceted problems may be related to what I call the values vacuum; however, the Religious Right’s exclusively Christian approach to addressing this values vacuum is not appropriate in a pluralistic constitutional democracy.  I argue that we Humanists should stand up for those inclusive democratic core values that are appropriate whether one is a believer or nonbeliever.  The American Humanist Association’s Ten Commitments: Guiding Principles for Teaching Values in America’s Public Schools are the type of values that need to be fostered within young human beings so that they might lead full and flourishing lives within our own country as well as in the greater complex, interdependent global community. My current purpose is not to explicate each of the AHA Ten Commitments, but to explain why they could be helpful in a greater context.  However, there are tensions inherent in implementing these inclusive values in our public schools of which we need to become aware.

 

One challenging tension is time constraints and its accompanying focus. Although an emphasis on academic competence in our public schools today is imperative given the challenges of the world that we live in, I am concerned that a sole focus on academic, “high-stakes tested” subjects such as math and literacy leads to a narrowing of the curriculum as an unintended consequence. Too often the social studies, arts, and humanities are excluded and yet, these are the very subjects in which students might learn to become critical thinkers and ethical human beings and citizens. In recent years there has been an increased focus on STEM subjects--Science, Technology, and Math—all necessary for our country’s economic growth and development, but this focus has resulted in a further eroding and narrowing of the curriculum in many, if not most of our public schools to the exclusion of the social studies, arts and humanities.

 

 In addition to time constraints, teaching critical thinking and ethical values is often considered too controversial to find a place in the public school curriculum. Ethical values are thought by some to be entirely contingent on religious belief. It is thought that without religious belief there is no absolute foundation and moral relativism is the result. Furthermore, critical thinking is thought by some to be a negative challenge to authority and morally absolute worldviews. Conversely, others of a more secular persuasion are wary of religious indoctrination related to values in the public school classroom. In order to avoid controversy, public school students are often left without the tools to critically reason or to reflect upon the role that ethical values should and could play in their lives—the very attributes that are essential for thoughtful and ethical citizenship.

 

We have a long history of individual freedom of conscience and separation of church and state in the United States. Our First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution seeks to neither establish nor inhibit the free exercise of religion; in other words, citizens in our country are free to believe in religious tenets or not. Because of this freedom and diversity, there are conflicts and tensions within the public schools.  However, I believe that teaching critical thinking and ethical values can help individual young people to navigate these conflicts for the common good, while still maintaining a high degree of respect for pluralism in matters of individual conscience in the true spirit of e pluribus unum. Students might learn that they have the right to make choices and must exercise those choices with responsibility to self and others.

 

While ethical values do not necessarily rely on specific religious principles, they do not necessarily exclude religious values when these religious values are of a more universally accepted and inclusive nature. For instance, empathy inherent in the idea that we should treat others as we would be treated is present in many religions including Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, as well as, secular, philosophical systems; most agree that the ethical principles within the “Golden Rule” are foundational in matters relating to conscience. In fact, Immanuel Kant, the great moral philosopher, calls this idea a “universal categorical imperative.” Empathy is just one ethical value among many that diverse citizens may agree upon, given the wide range of religious, philosophical and ideological perspectives.

 

The American Humanist Association’s Ten Commitments could help fill this values vacuum by encouraging the citizenship dispositions of critical thinking about the core democratic values that are needed to perpetuate a functioning democracy that should be inclusive of all—believers and nonbelievers alike. Honesty, the common good, equality of opportunity, justice and fairness respect for individual liberties and dignity, etc. are values and principles that we should all be able to agree upon.

 

When students have the opportunity to learn how to internalize and apply critical thinking skills and ethical values in their lives and in interactions with others, they are able to intelligently and courageously work to balance individual rights and the common good. Rather than avoiding controversy, this approach teaches students to embrace controversy with critical thinking, fair-mindedness, reasoning, civility and courage with the intent of arriving at reasoned and ethical judgments in the public space. This inclusive approach combats the charge of moral relativism that is often leveled against Humanists, while respecting the common values contributions by citizens from the faith community.

 

However, a point needs to be made and clarified: everyone talks a great deal about critical thinking, but no one seems to be able to state intentionally and systematically exactly what critical thinking is and how it can be taught. I have found the systematic approach to teaching critical thinking and ethical values articulated by Dr. Richard Paul and Dr. Linda Elder of the Foundation for Critical Thinking (http://www.criticalthinking.org/) to be very helpful in facilitating the acquisition of critical reasoning skills and ethical values in my students. Paul and Elder have organized their system of critical thinking into three main components—elements, standards and virtues (ethical values.) Students use the elements of critical thinking such as perspective, questions, assumptions, inferences, implications, etc. to analyze their own thinking and that of others; they use the standards of critical thinking such as accuracy, clarity, logic, depth and breadth, etc. to evaluate their own thinking and that of others; and finally, they use the virtues of critical thinking to ensure that ethical values such as fairness, empathy, integrity, and civility are present when diverse perspectives, values and interests interact in the public arena.

 

Applying the Paul/Elder model to human interactions, problems or issues requires individuals to “think about their thinking while they are thinking in order to improve their thinking” with the goal of making and articulating well- reasoned and ethical judgments. It is essential in a democratic society that relies upon an informed and thoughtful citizenry, to engage students in the type of education and thinking that fosters awareness of ethical values and critical thinking. These skills and values don’t “just happen” magically; they must be taught and applied intentionally within many contexts. Critical Thinking and democratic core values should not be dogmatically taught—but given the skills of critical thinking--- students gain a model and process for interacting with and interrogating “reality.”  The American Humanist Association’s Ten Commitments with its emphasis on critical thinking and ethical values could be a very helpful and inclusive educational guide in leading young people to more thoughtfully and ethically reflect upon their rights and responsibilities in this complex interdependent world in order to assume the highest office of the land—citizen!