Bookmark this page

Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy.

Click Here for our professional translations.


Print Page Change Text Size: T T T

PERMISSION TO USE OUR WORK

Please note: Requests relating to any of the following titles should now be directed to Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.  

If you would like permission to use our work, please downlaod a copy of the form linked below, fill it out, and submit it to us at cct@criticalthinking.org.

The purpose of the Foundation for Critical Thinking is to advance fairminded critical thinking in human societies across the world and in every part of human life. We hope that our work is always used in keeping with this philosophy.  

Because we understand that critical thinking must be conceptualized deeply if it is to be transformative, we recommend that more, rather than fewer, materials on critical thinking be used in teaching and learning. Therefore, for instance, rather than requesting to use one or two pages from one of our thinkers guides, we suggest that you encourage students to purchase our (modestly priced) guides for use in their classes and their lives. 

We are also concerned that our work not be taken out of context and (perhaps inadvertently) misapplied. Again, we are fundamentally concerned with advancing a fairminded conception of critical thinking - strong sense critical thinking, rather than weak sense critical thinking (a phenomenon already too common in human life). In other words, we do not support our work being used to foster critical thinking without concern for the rights and needs of all people and other sentient creatures across the globe.

If you would like to modify our work in any way, please submit attachments that precisely show these modifications. In general we suggest that our theoretical work be used as is, rather than be reworded or reworked. We of course invite high quality contextualizations of critical thinking in all domains.

For printed works, please submit all pages connected to our work that you would like to use. This includes images from our books and guides.

Should our copyrighted material be used to aid any form of academic research, permission approval is contingent upon the Foundation receiving a copy of the final research findings, as well as links to any articles arising out of the research. The FCT reserves the right to post research findings on its website, in relevant FCT publications, etc., and to use the findings in any way it so chooses.

Files available for download  »
  • FCT Permissions Form
    •



    Please do not pass this message by.

    CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

    Here are some of the big reasons why:

    1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
    2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
    3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
    4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
    5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
    6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
    7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
    8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

    As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

    WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

    Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.