Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy.

Click Here for our professional translations.


Print Page Change Text Size: T T T




Wednesday, July 30, 2014
7:00 pm - 8:30 pm
Claremont Room


          The evening roundtable discussions offer an opportunity for us to engage in lively informal discussion about important topics in education and society. Due to the large number of roundtable topics submitted for this year's conference, we have clustered the roundtables into group discussions by topic. Each roundtable will begin with brief (5-10 minute) introductions by each presenter. Following this will be lively questioning and dialogue by all participants in the roundtable. Join any discussion and move between and among tables and groups, as you wish.


Critical Thinking in Public Citizenship

Supporting Critical Thought by Building Resiliency (Patricia Doerr and Carol Robinson Zanartu, Professor and Chair, Department of Counseling and School Psychology, San Diego State University)

Critical Thinking in Study Skills Training: Para Todos (For Everyone) (Joseph Velasquez, Founder and CEO, OjoOido Academics, LLC)

Critical Thinking & Citizen Work (Jennifer K. Greene, Associate Professor of Philosophy, St. Edward's University)



Critical Thinking Professional Development

Institutional Enhancement for Critical Thinking: Findings and Experiences from a Long-Term Quality Enhancement Plan (Barbara Rodriguez, District Director, Quality Enhancement Dept., Broward College, and Nathalie Franco, Assistant Professor, Behavioral Science Dept., Broward College)

Saving Education: Why Teachers Need to be Taught How to Teach Thinking (Jennifer Jo Mokiao, Sixth Grade Teacher and Educational Speaker, Del Mar Union School District)

Critical Thinking in the Classroom (and Online): A Transformative and Iterative Process (Robert Kelley, Professor of Psychology, MiraCosta College)

 

Skepticism, Science, and Critical Thinking

Skepticism - An Essential Quality of Critical Thinking (Danhua Wang, Associate Professor, Department of Development Studies, College of Educational and Educational Technology, Indiana University, of Pennsylvania)

Reconsidering the Sciences: Vision Through a Cultural Lens (Craig A. Hassel, Associate Professor & Extension Specialist, Department of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Minnesota)


Critical Thinking in Elementary Instruction

"I Say, You Say, and Confucius Says": Engaging Upper-Elementary School Children in a Philosophical Inquiry into the Teachings of Confucius in the Analects (Jessica Ching Sze Wang, Associate Professor, Department of Education, National Chiayi University, Taiwan)

Teaching Kindergarteners Math Through Questioning and Storytelling (Ivy Randle, Doctoral Candidate, Argosy Online University)



Innate Barriers to Criticality

Obstacles to Critical Thinking: Human Biological (Neurological) Nature (Burt Stillar, Assistant Professor of Social Sciences, West Coast University, Los Angeles)

The Human Mind: Limited and Suspect (Sam Karras, Mathematics Instructor and Interventionist)



Approaches to Critical Thinking in Research and Teaching

Critical Thinking Skills in Fitness-Wellness Courses: A Preliminary Study (John H. Downing, Associate Professor, Kinesiology, Missouri State University)

Thinking About Validity and Reliability in Grades 4-13 (Theo Dawson, Executive Director, Lectica, Inc.)

The Use of a Critical Thinking Research Rubric for Grading Graduate-Level Research Proposals (Juanita Holliman, Critical Thinking Curriculum Specialist, Chicago State University)

 

To What Extent Can Debate, Informal Logic, and Alternative Approaches Such as Chess Lead to Critical Thinking?

A Direct Approach to Teaching Critical Thinking Skills (Scott Sprouse, Former Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University)

Quantification of Debate-Style Learning (Robert W. Nithman, Assistant Professor, Midwestern University)

Cultivating Educated Citizens Through Fallacy Analysis of Presidential Debates: A 10-Year Case Study of the 2014 Bush-Kerry Debate (James A. Snyder, Chair of the Philosophy Department, Mercyhurst University)

Chess and Critical Thinking in the Classroom with a Special Emphasis on Native American Students (Mark C. Anderson, Instructor, Humanities and Liberal Arts, Blackfeet Community College)

 

Cultural and Linguistic Barriers to Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking in an Intercultural Scoping: Politeness Strategies: Intercultural and Language Barriers (Katherine Flores, Legal Interpreter, Educational Projects Development & Tutorship)

Infusing Critical Thinking into L2 Writing Instruction (Yanning Dong, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Language and Literacy Education, University of British Columbia)



Critical Thinking and Business

Critical Thinking - Smart Thinking for Peak Performance (Valerie Pierce, Founder and Director, Clear Thinking in Action)



Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.